HNA Zoning and Development Committee Meeting Agenda for November 2, 2015

HNA Zoning Agenda

November 2, 2015 

Time: 6:45pm         Location: Hancock Recreation Center

Agenda:

  1. Call meeting to order
  2. Action Item: Discuss and review the proposed draft for the HZ-D Committee and HNA process document.
  3. Neighborhood Communication- three minutes to address any zoning concerns and items
  4. New Business- future agenda items
  5. Adjourn

https://www.hancockna.org/www/content/hna-z-d-agenda-151102docx
https://www.hancockna.org/www/content/hna-z-d-agenda-151102pdf

Neighborhood Stakeholder Meeting Saturday, October 17

Please share & encourage others to attend – and RSVP if they can go to either of the meetings:

http://www.austintexas.gov/event/neighborhood-stakeholder-meeting

Carol Gibbs, Neighborhood Advisor http://www.austintexas.gov/neighbor
Neighborhood Assistance Center
Planning & Zoning Department
512-974-7219

HNA Zoning Committee Minutes for October 12, 2015

HNA Zoning Committee Minutes: October 12, 2015

  1. Approval of Minutes from September 7, 2015. Vote: 6-0
  2. Action Item #2: HNA Z-D Mission and Process document draft was reviewed and discussed. The final draft will be vote on at the Nov. meeting.
  3. Action Item #3: Reviewed the Mc Mansion rules regarding FAR on ADU’s .The Z-D Committee recommends enforcement of existing code. COA staff is required to enforce code with heavy fines /remove illegal structure when project is in violation of current code Vote 6-0
  4. Z-D Committee discussed the Type1/2 Short Term Rental amendments. Our HNA President sent a letter (10/7/15) to Councilmembers regarding our concerns of negative impact to HNA residents.
  5. No citizen communication
  6. Meeting Adjourned at 7:56 pm.

https://www.hancockna.org/www/content/zc-minutes-october-2015docx
https://www.hancockna.org/www/content/zc-minutes-october-2015pdf

October 10, 2015 Barbara Epstein Open Letter to Mayor and Council Regarding Duplexes

October 10, 2015

Dear Mayor Adler and Councilmembers:

The original sit-in movement in India was called a dharna; a claimant sat, fasting and blocking the doorstep of the offending person, sometimes threatening to commit suicide, until their demand for justice was met. Will it take a dharna to convince the City Council to stop the destruction of our city’s historic neighborhoods in the name of densification and affordable housing?

It is time for the Council to help Austinites who live and pay high taxes in older neighborhoods, not the absentee landlords who build whatever housing the market will bear. I ask you to revise Sections 25-2-555 and 25-2-556 of the city code so that “duplexes” must be built to a compatible design and scale to the single-family houses around them, including occupancy limits and parking spaces.

Based on my reading of the city code and conversations with city staff, if a lot is 10,000 sq. ft. or larger, a “duplex” can be constructed with a floor-to-area ratio up to 0.57 to 1, an impervious cover limit up to 55%, while the total number of bedrooms and baths depends on the lot size and parking restrictions. The code states that a duplex on a lot smaller than 10,000 sq. ft. is limited to 4,000 sq. ft. and 6 bedrooms/6 baths if the residents are unrelated. If the duplex is on a 10,000 sq. ft. or larger lot, it is limited to 6 bedrooms/6 baths and 8,000 sq. ft., if the residents are unrelated.

However, if applicants tell the city that the residents will be related, (a completely unenforceable standard), the number of permitted bedrooms and baths can be increased. Apparently, the project size only begins to look unattractive to owners when the duplex exceeds 10 bedrooms and 10 baths, because that is when one parking space per bedroom is required. These structures are NOT duplexes, they are apartments, and the city should end this fiction. Good urban planning would dictate that these large structures are only appropriate on corridor streets, as apartments.

The city core, say, the Austin map of 1930, especially around UT, is already densely populated. These neighborhoods are never “affordable” when new housing is built. I asked a tenant what his rent is in a new utilitarian six unit two-building complex (3400 sq. ft. and 9800 sq. ft. buildings respectively) and was shocked to learn that his smaller unit costs $3600 per month. The owner on county tax records lists a Los Angeles address, so clearly their only interest in this neighborhood is the income that can be generated from it, not its impact on the community.

Past City councils promised UT neighborhoods that if they didn’t protest the development of West Campus, they would get neighborhood preservation through neighborhood plans. But neighborhood associations have no legal standing (unless they incorporate) and neighborhood plans have no legal standing, so these were hollow promises. Plus, a neighborhood only learns of a permit once it is filed, and a developer can work out any problematic details privately with city staff before they ever file a permit. Despite the PR about neighborhood clout, they have little say about what gets built. Unlike subdivisions, our neighborhoods have no HOAs to impose order on what is built; our only protection is what is in Austin’s zoning code.

The McMansion ordinance doesn’t protect our neighborhoods because absentee owners have figured out that “stealth dorm duplexes” provide maximum returns. Right now, on Beanna Street, a tiny residential street, a “duplex” is being legally built with 10 bedrooms/10 baths and 8,000 square feet. Nearby, on Liberty Street, an absentee owner legally subdivided a lot, then built a 3498 sq. ft. 6 bedroom/6 bath “duplex” along the alley, and a 4 bedroom/3 bath 3694 sq. ft. duplex in front of it. Ask yourselves if you would want to live next door to these massive structures? I doubt it.

Neighbors like me, who spent their nest eggs on their houses are left helplessly watching as their streets crumble house by house at the hands of these greedy, absentee owners. Zoning is supposed to provide orderly development and stability in a city, not a chaotic building boom that benefits only absentee landlords and discourages both property maintenance and owner occupancy.

Please don’t perpetuate the lie that Austin’s old neighborhoods matter if you are not willing to protect them with sensible and effective zoning laws. I ask you to take decisive action to revise the duplex ordinances now.

Sincerely,

Barbara Epstein
Hancock Neighborhood

Revised HNA Zoning and Development Committee Meeting Agenda for October 12, 2015

HNA Zoning Agenda

October 12, 2015 

Time: 6:45pm         Location: Hancock Recreation Center

Agenda:

  1. Call meeting to order
  2. Action Item: Discuss and review the proposed HZ-D Committee and HNA process document
  3. Discuss and review Type 2 and Type Short Term Rentals amendments being proposed by Council Members Tovo /Pool
  4. Action Item: Discuss and review the Casar's McMansion rules regarding FAR on AUD’s
  5. Neighborhood Communication- three minutes to address any zoning concerns and items
  6. New Business- future agenda items
  7. Adjourn

https://www.hancockna.org/www/content/hna-z-d-agenda-151012-2docx
https://www.hancockna.org/www/content/hna-z-d-agenda-151012-2pdf

October 7, 2015 HNA Executive and Zoning & Development Committees Letter Regarding Short Term Rentals

Mayor and Council:

Members of the Hancock Neighborhood Association's Executive Committee and Zoning and Development Committee urge the Mayor and Council members to support Mayor Pro Tem Kathie Tovo and Council member Leslie Pool's proposals for Type 2 and Type 3 short term rentals. Ours is a neighborhood which knows the negative impact of Type 2 short term rentals; it is not only the noise of gatherings or parking, it is about allowing our residential neighborhoods to be hospitality centers and encouraging investors to buy and/or build duplexes and residential housing for the purpose of short term Type 2 rentals. This type of investment activity will only increase if a high number of users--a proposed cap of 10 for a house, and as many as 20 for a duplex, as we understand it — are allowed in short term Type 2 rentals. This is outrageous.

The hospitality industry claims that no growing city in the U.S. has been able to regulate Type 2 STRs except by permitting them through licenses. We reject this argument. Austin’s Code Department has failed to enforce the rules that we have today. If they were to do so, the deterrent effect would become apparent.

But fundamentally Type 2 Short Term rentals should not be in residential areas.

As to Type 3 short term rentals, we find it incomprehensible that the Mayor and Council would continue to allow 25% of a multi family project to be used as Type 3 STRs while at the same time there is pressure to densify our neighborhoods.

Mark Harkrider, Pres. HNA
James Harkrider, Vice Pres. HNA
Mary Sanger, Sec. HNA
Bruce Fairchild, Tres. HNA
Linda Guerrero, Chair HNA Zoning Comm.
Carolyn Palaima, Past Pres. HNA, member HNA Zoning Comm.
Bart Whatley, member HNA Zoning Comm
Hugh Bender, member HNA Zoning Comm.

APD Commander's Forum October 13 at McCallum High School

Please join us for the APD Region 1 Commander's Forum on Tuesday, October 13th. We will be meeting at McCallum High School located at 5600 Sunshine Drive in the school library and will start the at 6:30pm. Come meet your neighbors and residents of Region 1, along with the Region 1 Commander and the APD District Representatives.

Regards,

Officer G. Griffin #3439
Austin Police Department
Region 1 (Baker) District Representatives
Office 512.974.8392
Gary.Griffin@AustinTexas.gov

Your Input Needed on District 9 Transportation Priorities

INVITATION TO DISTRICT 9 MOBILITY CONVERSATION

Dear District 9 Neighborhood Leaders,

Each year the City of Austin receives funding through our partnership with Capital Metro to be spent on projects enhancing mobility and public transit. Right now, the City Council is engaged in a conversation on how to allocate these "Quarter Cent Funds" and which mobility-related projects in our neighborhoods should be prioritized.

At this time, it appears that the City Council will be looking to allocate this year's funds to smaller-scale mobility projects that can augment our pedestrian, bicycle, and street networks in each Council district.

As your representative, I've been asked to consider a list of high priority mobility projects in our District 9 neighborhoods. The total amount of funding available to District 9 has yet to be decided; however, I need your help in evaluating this list and potentially identifying alternative mobility projects that will meet the mobility needs of District 9.

District 9 is laying the foundation for Austin’s multi-modal transportation future. With the investments we’ve made in augmenting our road network with public transit, bicycle infrastructure, sidewalks, and traffic demand management, District 9 has made significant progress in improving transportation options. Nonetheless, we have far more work to do!

I need your help in two ways:

(1) Attend our District 9 Mobility Conversation – Friday, Oct. 2nd at 3pm – City Hall Room 1029 (aka the “Staff Bullpen”) On Friday, October 2nd at 3pm, I will host an informal meeting to discuss the mobility needs in District 9. We will review and share a list of projects that have been identified by City Staff as immediate mobility needs in District 9 neighborhoods. Due to space limitations, we ask that your neighborhood designate no more than two representatives to attend. Please RSVP to Bobby.Levinski@austintexas.gov.

(2) Ask your neighborhood to provide feedback on mobility needs. If anyone in your neighborhood would like a mobility project considered for Quarter Cent funding, please email Bobby.Levinski@austintexas.gov. While we likely will only be able to fund a limited number of mobility projects this year, we can add these ideas to future conversations and planning processes. The council's Mobility Committee will be meeting on October 5th. If possible, please send in comments before that date. However, I will of course be very grateful for any comments received after that date as well.

Thank you for your leadership and involvement in our community. Please feel free to reach out to my office whenever I can be of assistance.

Best regards,
Kathie

P.S. Please feel free to forward this email to any neighborhood representative that may have been inadvertently omitted.
Kathie Tovo

Mayor Pro Tem
Council District 9
512.978.2109

Syndicate content